Accuracy, validation and limitations
- Author / publisher
- Starlight Robotics
- Last updated
- Mathematics review
- No named independent mathematics reviewer is credited for this version.
- Accuracy methodology
- Symbolic rule transformations, exact rational arithmetic and symbolic constants precede decimal evaluation. The six worked examples below are hand-worked validation cases; automated checks compare their outputs and exercise domain errors.
- Input limits
- Two to six single-letter variables; 300-character functions; 100-character component expressions; up to 15 significant digits per numeric literal and scientific exponents from −100 to 100. Exact expressions may remain unsimplified. Decimal answers use floating-point arithmetic.
- Unsupported syntax
- No free parameters in coordinates, piecewise definitions, inequalities, complex values, factorials or unevaluated integrals. Write x*y, not xy. Use sqrt(2), not √2; log(x) means base 10.
- Differentiability
- The gradient formula assumes differentiability in a neighborhood of P. Undefined expressions and common singularities are rejected, but this tool cannot certify differentiability or handle every removable singularity. A zero gradient alone does not prove a maximum or minimum.
- Privacy
- Calculations and plot sampling run on your device. Permalinks include the inputs in the URL; share them only when intended.
Report a calculation error
Copy a report containing your inputs, computed result and this page's URL. Add the expected answer and the step that appears incorrect when sharing it with the site maintainer. This control prepares a report; it does not send it automatically.
